Edmonds v. Hall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohNsoN, J.
The defendants’ only exception is to the order continuing the temporary restraining order until the final determination of the cartway proceeding. Therefore the single question presented by this appeal is whether the facts found by the court below are sufficient to sustain the order. Sprinkle v. Reidsville, 235 N.C. 140, 69 S.E. 2d 179.
The rule that prevailed under the old equity practice is stated thus by Pearson, J., in Parker v. Grammer, 62 N.C. 28 : “Where there is reason to apprehend that the subject of a controversy in equity will he destroyed, or removed, or otherwise disposed of by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cobb v. Clegg.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
- Boone v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Sprinkle v. City of ReidsvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Young v. . PittmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hall v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Western Conference of Original Free Will Baptists of North Carolina v. CreechSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Orkin Exterminating Co. of Raleigh, Inc. v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Setzer v. AnnasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
- Kurtzworth v. Illinois Racing BoardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
- PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NC, INC. v. City of ShelbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.