Hall v. Queen City Coach Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSbawell, J.
The court below was not dealing with the final issue, but merely with the question whether the temporary restraining order should be continued to the hearing. As the judge was not requested to find the facts in writing, and did not do so, under our practice it will be presumed that, for the purpose of his order, he found facts sufficient to support it. Therefore, we are unable to find grounds for reversal.
However, in this Court, counsel for I. E. Chandler demurred, ore tenus, to the complaint as not stating a cause of. action against him. Upon examination of the pleadings, we are of the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Orkin Exterminating Co. of Raleigh, Inc. v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Edmonds v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Brown v. DobySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Howze v. McCallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Seymour v. WS BOYD SALES COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.