Legal Opinion

Sprinkle v. City of Reidsville

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 27, 1952No. 22PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEbviN, J.

In its written brief and oral argument, the appellant follows the precedent set by the Walrus in Lewis Carroll’s pleasing fantasy entitled “Through the Looking-Glass.”

“The time has come,” the Walrus said,
“To talk of many things:

Of Shoes — and Ships — and sealing-wax—

Of cabbages — and Kings—

And why the sea is boiling bot—

And whether pigs have wings.”

As a consequence, the appellant debates many intriguing legal propositions not sanctioned by the exceptions noted by it at the trial. For example, it asserts with much earnestness and eloquence that the testimony of the plaintiffs does not suffice…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Starnes v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  2. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Smith v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Spivey v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lewter v. Abercrombie Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Ziegelasch v. DurrSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Worsley v. S. &. W. Rendering Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. Lipe v. Guilford National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API