Legal Opinion

Setzer v. Annas

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 12, 1975No. 84PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHARP, Chief Justice.

The Court of Appeals held defendant was not deprived of any substantial right by the preliminary injunction of 19 Sep tember 1973 and therefore had no right under G.S. 1-277 to appeal. Under G.S. 1A-1, Rule 65, the term 'preliminary injunction refers to an interlocutory injunction issued after notice and hearing which restrains a party pending trial on the merits.

Ordinarily, to justify the issuance of a preliminary injunction it must be made to appear (1) there is probable cause that plaintiff will be able to establish the right he asserts, and (2) there is reasonable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Board of Provincial Elders of the Southern Province of the Moravian Church v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Merrell v. JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Edmonds v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Travenol Laboratories, Inc. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Pruitt v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. Lloyd v. BabbSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Kaplan v. Prolife Action League of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Waff Bros. v. Bank of North Carolina, N.A.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API