Young v. . Pittman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
DEFENDANTS’ APPEAL.
Devin, J.
Tbe defendants base tbeir appeal from tbe order continuing tbe temporary restraining order to tbe bearing upon tbe ground that tbe title to tbe mineral rights claimed by plaintiff in tbe described lands was in dispute, and that tbe ancillary remedy of injunction properly would not be available until final determination of tbe issues of fact.
Ordinarily, a court of equity will not interfere by injunction to determine a disputed question of title to land, nor undertake to dispossess one party for tbe benefit of another, but rather will leave tbe controverted issues of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Black v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Cobb v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Jackson v. . JerniganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Vance v. . PritchardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Hoilman v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- English v. Holden Beach Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Huskins v. Yancey HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Edmonds v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Armstrong Ex Rel. Martin v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Conrad v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.