Legal Opinion
Jones v. Otero
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 31, 1984No. B002038PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALSIMER, J.
On September 4, 1980, plaintiffs, Curtis H. Jones and Linda L. Jones, filed a first amended complaint for specific performance. On September 10, 1980, defendants filed their answer. On September 10, 1982, defendants filed a motion for preference in trial setting as authorized under Code of Civil Procedure section 36 on the grounds that defendants George Otero and Jean Otero were each over 70 years of age. The trial had theretofore been set, and, when the motion for preference was heard on October 1, 1982, the court ordered that “The Trial date of January 31, 1983 [was] to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- O'BRIEN v. CsehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Stein v. HassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Williams v. Travelers InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Duggan v. MossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Blumenthal v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lucky United Properties Investment, Inc. v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Wayne Wright v. Charles BeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Alliance Bank v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Newland v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Koch-Ash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.