Legal Opinion

Koch-Ash v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 1, 1986No. B018365PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS, P. J.

By petition for mandate civil plaintiffs, whose actions were severed for trial from the consolidated actions of numerous other plaintiffs, seek to prevent the trial court from denying them the preferential trial date conferred by Code of Civil Procedure section 36, subdivisions (a) and (e).

The determinative question presented is whether section 36, subdivision (a), leaves trial courts with discretion to deny preferential trial rights to litigants who qualify under that statute. Here, the trial court claims such discretion to serve judicial economy and to protect defendants…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rice v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. Thurmond v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Conner v. Bank of BakersfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Houghton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Landry v. Berryessa Union School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Freiberg v. City of Mission ViejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Swaithes v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Granquist v. SandbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Thompson v. ErwinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API