Legal Opinion
O'BRIEN v. Cseh
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1983No. Civ. 69521PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALSIMER, J.
Defendant Bella Cseh, appeals from an order imposing sanctions of $150 in attorney’s fees on her pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 128.5. (All further statutory references are to the Code of Civil Procedure.) Defendant contends that the order is invalid because the notice requirements of due process and section 128.5 were not met and because the order does not detail justification for the imposition of sanctions with the degree of specificity required by section 128.5. We agree with both contentions and reverse the order.
Plaintiff, Louise Bertha O’Brien, filed a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Bauguess v. PaineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Wisniewski v. ClaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Ellis v. Roshei Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1983
3Cited by31 opinions
- I. J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Lavine v. Hospital of the Good SamaritanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Drum v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Childs v. PAINE WEBBER INCORPORATEDCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Caldwell v. Samuels JewelersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.