Legal Opinion

Blumenthal v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1980No. Civ. 48847PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WHITE, P. J.

This petition presents the question of whether discovery sanctions under Code of Civil Procedure section 2034, subdivision (d) may be ordered against an attorney where the moving papers seek sanctions only against his clients. We have concluded that the $1,000 award against petitioner must be annulled because petitioner was not given notice and a reasonable opportunity to defend against the sanction.

On August 28, 1979, after petitioner’s client failed to appear for a deposition scheduled for the previous day, real parties in interest, the plaintiffs below, noticed a motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Goodenough v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. San Diego County Department of Public Welfare v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  4. San Diego Wholesale Credit Men's Ass'n. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. Weinkauf v. Superior Court of Tuolumne CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Lesser v. Huntington Harbor Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Cromwell v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1998
  5. In Re Marriage of FullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API