Legal Opinion
Mazur v. Merck & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided June 18, 1992No. 91-1613PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
964 F.2d 1348
60 USLW 2808, 75 Ed. Law Rep. 745,
Prod.Liab.Rep. (CCH) P 13,183
Anthony MAZUR and Edna Mazur as Parents and Guardians of
Lisa Marie Mazur, a Minor, and Anthony Mazur and
Edna Mazur, in their own right, Appellants,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC.
No. 91-1613.
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 23, 1992.
Decided May 20, 1992.
Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc
Denied June 18, 1992.
David R. Dearden (argued), Thomas A. Sprague, Richard A. Sprague, Paul Crowley, Sprague, Creamer & Sprague, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellants.
Kenneth C. Frazier (argued), Joanne Lahner, Drinker, Biddle &…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Incollingo v. EwingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Incollingo v. EWINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hahn v. RichterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Soufflas v. Zimmer, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Parkinson v. Guidant Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- McLaughlin v. Bayer Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Salvio v. Amgen, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.