Legal Opinion

City of Memphis v. Overton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided December 6, 1964PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBejach, J.

This cause involves a suit for declaratory judgment filed by the City of Memphis against the heirs, known and unknown, of John Overton, William Winchester, James Winchester, and John C. McLemore, Proprietors of the City of Memphis at the time same was founded in 1819 on the western part of what is known as the Rice Grant of 5,000 acres. Andrew Jackson had been One of the Proprietors, along with John Overton and *421James C. Winchester, but Ms interest in the land bad been acquired by "William Winchester and John C. Mc-Lemore. By its amended bill, the City of Memphis seeks a declaration that it is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Barclay v. Richard W. Howell's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Hamilton County v. RapeTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  5. McCord v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  2. City of Memphis v. OvertonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Yates v. Metropolitan GovernmentCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1969
  4. Aaron Patrick Taylor v.Joseph Winston HarshCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
  5. Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API