Legal Opinion

Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. Stuart

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1968Published

1Opinion of the Court

428 S.W.2d 786 (1968)

J.D. BLOODWORTH, d/b/a Bloodworth Construction Company, Petitioner.

v.

James M. STUART, Jr., by Next Friend, Louise Stuart, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

April 8, 1968.

Rehearing Denied June 7, 1968.

William J. Harbison, Nashville, of counsel: Trabue, Minick. Sturdivant & Harbison, Nashville, for petitioner.

William R. Willis, Jr., Nashville, of counsel: Hooker, Hooker & Willis and Philip M. Carden, Nashville, for respondent.

OPINION

CHATTIN, Justice.

In this opinion we will refer to the parties as they appeared in the trial court; that is, respondent as plaintiff and…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. RayTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Texas Co. v. AycockTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Tennessee Central Railway Co. v. UmenstetterTennessee Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Bloodworth v. Stuart Ex Rel. StuartTennessee Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Vaughn v. City of AlcoaTennessee Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API