City of Memphis v. Overton
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyer
This cause involves the title to certain realty located within that area dedicated by the original proprietors of the City of Memphis as the public promenade. Suit was brought by the City of Memphis as complainants against the heirs, known and unknown, of said proprietors. For brevity’s sake, the City of Memphis will be referred to as the City, while the' heirs will be referred to as such.
The suit apparently resulted from negotiations by the City with reference to either the long-term leasing or sale of the realty to a private corporation, for the purpose of construction of a hotel or motel.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Burnet v. Coronado Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Staten v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
- State v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Prince v. PrinceTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- Steppach v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011
- Town of Benton v. Peoples Bank of Polk CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
- State ex rel. Kessel v. AsheTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Union Trust Co. v. Williamson County Board of Zoning AppealsTennessee Supreme Court · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.