Andrew Corp. v. Rossi
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KEYS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(7). For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Andrew Corporation (“Andrew”) is an international manufacturer of telecommunications network hardware, and works to establish networks in all corners of the globe by participating in joint ventures with local businesses. (Defendant’s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, Counterclaims, and Jury Demand [Answer] 1Í 21.) This litigation…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Federal Open Market Committee of Federal Reserve System v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Dr. Chester A. Wilk v. American Medical Association, the State of New York, InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- In re Parmalat Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
- Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Hamilton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001
- Forst v. SmithKline Beecham Corp.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009
- Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition v. Elk Run Coal Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2013
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.