In re Parmalat Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
*240 OPINION AND ORDER
PITMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
Lead Plaintiffs move to unseal certain discovery materials which certain defendants have designated as confidential pursuant to the protective order entered in this matter.1 For the reasons discussed below, Lead Plaintiffs’ motion is granted.
II. Facts
The factual and procedural history of this case is set forth in several decisions by Judge Kaplan, familiarity with which is assumed. *241See In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 376 F.Supp.2d 472 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (granting in part and denying in part motion to dismiss first amended…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by173 opinions
- Dodona I, LLC v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Oliver Wyman, Inc. v. EielsonDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2017
- Lytle v. JPMORGAN CHASEDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Department of InteriorDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Eagle Laboratories, Inc. Bio-Kinetics Corporation And Dana SummersSupreme Court of Iowa · 2015
168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.