Legal Opinion

Casey v. American Bridge Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1912No. Nos. 17,248—(118)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Action in the district court for Hennepin county by the administratrix of the estate of William Casey, deceased, to recover $10,000 for the death of her intestate. Erom an order, Steele, J., overruling defendant’s demurrer to the amended complaint, it appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Start, 0. J.

Appeal by tbe defendant from an order of tbe district court of tbe county of Hennepin overruling its general demurrer to the complaint. The question presented .by the record is whether it conclusively appears upon the face of the complaint that the action is barred by the statute of limitations.

The action was commenced January 12, 1911. The here material allegations of the complaint are to the effect following:

The defendant is a corporation organized under the laws of New Jersey. The plaintiff’s intestate, on March 17, 1901, was killed as a result of the negligence of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. O'Brien v. American Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Maylone v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  4. Rugland v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  5. Orth v. Village of BelgradeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. William J. Emmett, Administrator of the Estate of Joseph N. Emmett v. Eastern Dispensary and Casualty HospitalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Bean v. RumrillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Cashman v. HedbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  4. Bond v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Berghuis v. KorthuisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API