Legal Opinion
Bean v. Rumrill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1918No. 8229PublishedCited by 31 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by A. IV. Bean and Mamie Bean against George II. Rumrill. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error. |
1Opinion of the Court
It is alleged in plaintiffs' petition that defendant is and was a nonresident of the state, and absent continuously from the state at all times mentioned in the petition; that John A. Burt was the agent of the defendant, the agency being set forth in the following words:
"That at the times hereinafter mentioned, and for a long time prior thereto, John A. Burt was the general agent of defendant in the county and state of Oklahoma, with authority from said defendant to negotiate loans of money of defendant and collect the sums due thereon for the use and benefit of said defendant, and that said…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
- Miller v. Oklahoma State Bank of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. KeifferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Kreibohm v. YanceySupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
- Langley v. FordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. HymesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Goodwin v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Dies v. Bank of Commerce of SapulpaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Carlin v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Munn v. Mid-Continent Motor Securities Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.