Legal Opinion
Bradford v. Cole
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 31, 1923No. 14485PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCoohran, J.
This action, instituted in the district court of Okmulgee county, was in the nature of a.quo warranto proceeding against the defendants, who were officers of consolidated school district No-. 9, Ok-mulgee county, Okla., and involves the constitutionality of House Bill No. 463, passed by the Legislature of 1923. The act was passed for the purpose of creating a consolidated school district for white pupils to comprise a district formed out of territory existing in school districts Nos. 55, 36, and 56, Okmulgee county. Okla. The petition of the plaintiffs alleged that the act of the Legislature…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Commonwealth v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
- Bell County v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1913
- Hall v. Bell CountyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Taylor v. School District No. 83Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Reynolds v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Maule v. Independent School District No. 9Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Wall v. MaroukSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Grable v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Sparks v. Board of Library TrusteesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.