Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clark

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1844PublishedCited by 33 opinions

QUO WARRANTO, directed to James Clark, William B. Foster, Jun., and Jesse Miller, canal commissioners of Pennsylvania. Be it remembered that at a Supreme Court held at Harrisburg, in and for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, on the 21st day of May, in the year of our Lord 1844, comes Ovid F. Johnson, Attorney-General of the said Commonwealth, and on behalf of said Commonwealth gives the said court here to know and be informed that on the second Tuesday of January last…

Read the full summary

QUO WARRANTO, directed to James Clark, William B. Foster, Jun., and Jesse Miller, canal commissioners of Pennsylvania. Be it remembered that at a Supreme Court held at Harrisburg, in and for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, on the 21st day of May, in the year of our Lord 1844, comes Ovid F. Johnson, Attorney-General of the said Commonwealth, and on behalf of said Commonwealth gives the said court here to know and be informed that on the second Tuesday of January last past, to wit, on the 9th day of said month, at the borough of Harrisburg, the seat of government of the Commonwealth of…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Gibson, C. J.

It is unnecessary to advert to the common-law definition of an office, or to the supposed distinction between offices in the appointment of the executive, and offices within the power of the Legislature by the original constitution. The question for decision turns on the peculiar provisions of the amended constitution, and it lies within almost the bounds of a nutshell. The eighth section of the sixth article declares that “All officers whose election or appointment is not provided for in this constitution, shall be elected or appointed as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Leib v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1840

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. City of Evansville v. State ex rel. BlendIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Marx & Haas Jeans Clothing Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Yancey v. HydeIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Page v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
  5. Zemprelli v. ThornburghCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API