Legal Opinion
McDonald v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided October 7, 2003No. AC 22876PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The plaintiffs, Wendy McDonald and John McDonald, appeal from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the defendant, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, in this action to recover underinsured motorists benefits. The plaintiffs sought to recover benefits under a policy issued by the defendant to Wendy McDonald’s employer, Cumberland Farms, Inc. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the trial court improperly (1) determined that the monetary limits on the underinsured motorists policy had been reduced to the statutory minimum of $20,000 and (2)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lees v. Middlesex InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Barry v. Quality Steel Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Stokes v. LyddyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. PasionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. MalecSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kinsey v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Kazlon Communications, LLC v. American Golfer, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- McDonald v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Parker v. Ace American Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Russbach v. Yanez-VenturaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022