Legal Opinion
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Malec
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 19, 1990No. 13894PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCovello, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the trial court confirming a $1,000,000 underinsured *400motorist arbitration award. The sole issue is whether the insured properly elected to accept less uninsured motorist insurance than the statutory amount required by General Statutes § 38-175c (a) (2). We agree with the trial court’s conclusion that the purported election was ineffective and affirm the judgment.. The relevant facts are as follows. On May 18, 1982, the plaintiff, The Travelers Indemnity Company (Travelers), had in force a business automobile liability policy insuring American Red Cross.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beloff v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
3Cited by20 opinions
- Mass v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Harlach v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. PasionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Katherine Mazzaferro, Joanne Malec, and Ruth Glahn v. Rli Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kent v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.