Legal Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Pasion
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 30, 1991No. 14205PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtF. X. Hennessy, J.
The main issue in this appeal is whether a written request to reduce uninsured motorist coverage by one of two named insureds on an automobile liability insurance policy is sufficient to satisfy the writing required by General Statutes (Rev. to 1989) § 38-175c (a) (2).1 The plaintiff, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (Nationwide), appealed the judgment of the Superior Court confirming an uninsured motorist insurance award in favor of the defendant, Christina Pasión, to the Appellate Court. We transferred the appeal to this court pursuant to Practice Book § 4023 and affirm the trial court’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sanzone v. Board of Police CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Ardmare Construction Co. v. FreedmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- American Motorists Insurance v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- State v. PiersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Rydingsword v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Kinsey v. Pacific Employers InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Lowrey v. Valley Forge InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. BryantSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- General Accident Insurance Co. of America v. Powers, Bolles, Houlihan & Hartline, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.