Legal Opinion

Bewley v. Riggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1968No. Civ. 971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.

On this appeal the respondents were apparently so confident of their position that they did not see fit to aid the court even by filing a brief or arguing their side of the litigation. Notice was given to the parties pursuant to rule 17(b) of the California Rules of Court, and the respondents still saw fit to do nothing. The appellant notified the clerk that he did not wish to argue the case. Consequently, the appeal was submitted for decision on the record and appellant’s opening brief pursuant to rule 17(b) of the California Rules of Court.

The action had its origin in a four-car automobile…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stationers Corp. v. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Eagle Oil & Refining Co. v. PrenticeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Walsh v. WalshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Todhunter v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Case v. Kadota Fig Ass'n of ProducersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Valley Circle Estates v. VTN Consolidated, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Twohig v. BrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. People Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. Drury v. RyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. Shahram Seresht v. United States of America; and Does 1 to 10District Court, C.D. California · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API