Legal Opinion
In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center Transport
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided October 19, 1989No. C6-89-662PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
Relators Wintz Freight Systems (WFS), DGT Properties, Inc. (DGT), and their owners seek review by writ of certiorari from two orders of the MTRB. On January 26, 1989, the MTRB adopted the findings of the administrative law judge (AU) and concluded that DGT did not comply with Minn. Stat. § 221.151, subd. 1 (1988), and therefore was prohibited from receiving an irregular route common carrier (IRCC) permit. On March 15, 1989, the MTRB denied relators’ petition for reconsideration and rejected their plan of divestiture. We affirm.
FACTS
George Wintz Jr. is a successful…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Arvig Telephone Co. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Petition of Northern States Power Gas UtilityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re the Excess Surplus Status of Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- In re Minnesota Orchestral Ass'n for a Variance From Minn. R. 7030.0040 for the Operation of the Proposed Brooklyn Park Performing Arts CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000