Legal Opinion
Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'N
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 31, 1995No. C5-94-1820, C7-94-1821PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
529 N.W.2d 413 (1995)
MINNEGASCO, a DIVISION OF NORAM ENERGY CORP., f/k/a Minnegasco, a Division of Arkla, Inc., Relator (C5-94-1820),
Northern States Power Co., et al., Relators (C7-94-1821),
v.
MINNESOTA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Minnesota Alliance for Fair Competition, Respondents.
Nos. C5-94-1820, C7-94-1821.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
March 28, 1995.
Review Granted May 31, 1995.
Samuel L. Hanson, Briggs and Morgan, Miggie E. Cramblit, Brenda A. Bjorklund, Minnegasco, Div. of NorAm Energy Corp., Minneapolis, for relator Minnegasco.
Michael J. Bradley, M. Cecilia Ray, Moss & Barnett,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Markwardt v. State, Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1983
- Turpen v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Minnegasco v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- White v. MINN. DEPT. OF NATURAL RESOURCESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Rostamkhani v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Application of MinnegascoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.