Legal Opinion
Petition of Northern States Power Gas Utility
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 2, 1994No. C5-94-201, C7-94-202PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD W. SCHULTZ, Judge. *
Relators the Minnesota Attorney General (the AG), the Minnesota Department of Public Service (the Department), and the Minnesota Energy Consumers (the MEC) challenge the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission’s (the Commission’s) order after reconsideration authorizing Northern States Power Company (NSP) stockholders to receive 11.47% return on equity on gas and electric rates instead of 11% as recommended by the administrative law judge (ALJ) and originally ordered by the Commission.
Relators contend that the discounted cash flow method using five- and…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Humphrey v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Minnegasco v. MN PUBLIC UTILITIES COM'NCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Bloomquist v. Commissioner of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re Review of the 2005 Annual Automatic Adjustment of Charges for All Electric & Gas UtilitiesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re Detailing Criteria & Standards for Measuring an Electric Utility's Good Faith Efforts in Meeting the Renewable Energy Objectives Under Minn. Stat. 216B.1691Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Grand Rapids Public Utilities CommissionCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.