Legal Opinion

In re Minnesota Orchestral Ass'n for a Variance From Minn. R. 7030.0040 for the Operation of the Proposed Brooklyn Park Performing Arts Center

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 21, 2000No. C9-99-1855Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency granted respondent Minnesota Orchestral Association a noise variance for its proposed amphitheater. Relator, Preserve Our Environment, an environmental group, challenges the noise variance, arguing it is unsupported by the evidence and is arbitrary and capricious. Because record evidence supports the agency’s decision, which is not arbitrary or capricious, we affirm.

*480FACTS

Respondent Minnesota Orchestral Association (MOA), a nonprofit corporation in charge of funding the Minnesota Orchestra, wants to build an amphitheater in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re Continental Telephone Co. of Minnesota, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. In Re Continental Telephone Co. of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  3. McGuire v. County of ScottCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  4. In Re the Joint Petition of Space Center TransportCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API