In Re Reardon
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HERRMANN, Chief Justice.
After taking the 1976 Delaware Bar Examination, the petitioners were advised by the Board of Bar Examiners 1 that while they had passed all other parts of the Examination, they had failed the essay section and, therefore, failed to pass the Examination. The petitioners invoke this review of the Board’s decision, asserting that a certain policy decision adopted by the Board in connection with its scoring of the Examination was arbitrary and unfair as to the petitioners, and violative of their rights under the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Eugene W. Tyler v. Trammell E. Vickery, Ralph Banks, Jr. v. Trammell E. Vickery, James E. C. Perry v. Edward S. Sell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Application of PetersonAlaska Supreme Court · 1969
- David Richardson v. J. Means McFadden David Richardson v. J. Means McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Staley v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scinto v. StammSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Petition of RubensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- In Re HuntleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- In Re HudsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
- In Re Applicant No. 5 to the 1994 Delaware Bar & Professional Conduct ExaminationsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.