Legal Opinion
Application of Peterson
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1969No. 1066PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before NESBETT, C. J„ DIMOND, RABINOWITZ and BONEY, JJ., and LEWIS, Superior Court Judge. RABINOWITZ, Justice.
Arthur H. Peterson asks us to admit him to the practice of law in Alaska on the basis that he has met the requirements of both AS 08.08.130 and Rule II, Alaska Bar Rules, which embody prerequisites for ad mission. Additionally, appellant argues that he was denied due process of law through the manner in which his examination papers were graded by the Committee of Law Examiners. Appellant asserts that a further denial of procedural due process occurred by virtue of the Board of…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wieman v. UpdegraffSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Slochower v. Board of Higher Ed. of New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Willner v. Committee on Character and Fitness, Appellate Div. of Supreme Court of NY, First Judicial Dept.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Leroy Whitfield v. Illinois Board of Law Examiners, Len Young SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- DeLisio v. Alaska Superior CourtAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Rollins v. State, Department of Revenue, Alcoholic Beverage Control BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re StephensonAlaska Supreme Court · 1973
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.