Legal Opinion

In Re Applicant No. 5 to the 1994 Delaware Bar & Professional Conduct Examinations

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 15, 1995No. 489, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This is an appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 52(f) from a decision of the Board of Bar Examiners of the State of Delaware (“Board”) which denied a petition for reconsideration of petitioner’s failing grades in the 1994 Bar Examination. The petitioner, who has been accorded anonymity under the number assigned him in the examination, contends the Board acted arbitrarily in not affording him additional examination time to accommodate his disability of dyslexia. Alternatively, petitioner argues that he has demonstrated his competence to practice law in Delaware, and this Court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Petition of RubensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  2. In Re FischerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1981
  3. In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. In re MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  5. In re PettySupreme Court of Delaware · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Applicant No. 26 to the 2000 Delaware Bar Examination v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
  2. In re CahillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1996
  3. In Re Applicant 146 to the 2021 Delaware Bar ExaminationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2022
  4. In Re Petition of Marla Matrice MurphySupreme Court of Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API