Legal Opinion
Scinto v. Stamm
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 9, 1993No. 14538PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The principal issues in this appeal are: (1) whether the grading procedures of the Connecticut bar examining committee are arbitrary and capricious and therefore violate due process of law; and (2) whether a bar applicant who receives a failing score on the bar examination is constitutionally entitled to a judicial hearing for the purpose of regrading the applicant’s answers on the essay portion of the examination. The plaintiff, John J. Scinto, appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion for summary judgment and granting the motion for summary judgment of the defendants,…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners of NMSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Barrett v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Water & Way Properties v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Hunt v. PriorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Saturn Construction Co. v. Premier Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.