Legal Opinion
In Re Hudson
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided May 1, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
In this proceeding, Bruce L. Hudson (petitioner) seeks review of a decision by the Board of Bar Examiners (Board) refusing to certify him as qualified for admission to the Bar of the State of Delaware.
I
Admission to the Bar of Delaware is governed by the Supreme Court. Petition of Golby, Del.Supr., 375 A.2d 1049, 1050 (1977); Rule 52. Cf. Leis v. Flynt,-U.S.-, 99 S.Ct. 698, 700, 58 L.Ed.2d 717 (1979). The application and testing procedures are administered by the Board, Board of Bar Examiners Rule BR-52, which is appointed by the Court. Rule 51.
In his petition, Hudson alleges, among other…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Leis v. FlyntSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Eugene W. Tyler v. Trammell E. Vickery, Ralph Banks, Jr. v. Trammell E. Vickery, James E. C. Perry v. Edward S. Sell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- In Re ReardonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- In re GolbySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- In re W. M. I.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Petition of NennoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Petition of RubensteinSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
- In Re HuntleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- In re MurraySupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
- Applicant No. 26 to the 2000 Delaware Bar Examination v. Board of Bar ExaminersSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.