Legal Opinion

State v. Ott

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 1983No. 80-522-C; CA A23254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for the murder of his wife. Former ORS 163.115(1). He makes six assignments of error. We affirm.

It is unnecessary to detail the facts of the homicide in discussing the assignments of error. There was no dispute that defendant intentionally killed his wife; the principal issue at trial was defendant’s defense of extreme emotional disturbance which would allow the jury to find him guilty of manslaughter in the first degree. Former ORS 163.115(2). The first two assignments of error concern instructions given by the court regarding the defense of extreme emotional…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Shepard v. BoweOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. CarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
  4. State v. AkridgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Ott v. CushingOregon Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API