Legal Opinion

State v. Akridge

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1975No. 74-613-C, CA 4341PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLee, J.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of murder per ORS 163.115.

Defendant’s first assignment of error is that the trial court incorrectly instructed the jury on the phrase “extreme emotional disturbance.” ORS 163.-125(1)(b) provides:

“(1) Criminal homicide constitutes manslaughter when:
“(b) A homicide which would otherwise be murder is committed under the influence of extreme emotional disturbance, which disturbance is not the result of his own intentional, knowing, reckless or criminally negligent act, and for which disturbance there is a reasonable explanation

The court’s instruction on this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HolbrookOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Clevenger v. SchallhornOregon Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Piazza v. Clackamas Water DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. OttOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. CarsonOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Pettie v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. State v. HullCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API