Legal Opinion

State v. Cooper

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. 91-2249-C; CA A72530PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*492LEESON, J.

A jury convicted defendant of assault in the fourth degree and criminal mischief in the second degree. ORS 163.160; 164.354. The issue is whether the state can prevent the court from excluding a witness, who is a city police officer, by designating the officer as the state’s representative under OEC 615(2). We reverse and remand.

This is a simple assault and criminal mischief case. The pivotal issue in the trial was whether defendant or “the victim” was the aggressor. Both testified, and they gave notably different accounts of their altercation.

Davis testified that he is a process…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. VosikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  3. State v. EdeOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. State v. OttOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. VosikaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. CooperOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. State v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. DoernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  5. State v. DoernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API