Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ott v. Cushing

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1980No. 80-522-C, SC 27199PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTongue, J.

This is a mandamus proceeding in which the petitioner, who is the defendant in a criminal prosecution for the crime of murder, seeks to modify an order issued by the respondent, the trial judge before whom that proceeding is pending, which directed the defendant to submit to a psychiatric examination under conditions specified by the terms of that order.

Both attorneys for petitioner and attorneys for the State of Oregon, who represent the respondent, agree that the order in question was prepared in an effort to comply with the requirements of ORS 161.3151 and also with the requirements of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Houston v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Shepard v. BoweOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Oregon State Bar v. WrightOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MeyrickOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State v. HightowerOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State ex rel. Ott v. CushingOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. Ott v. CushingOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State v. OttCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API