Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Tamminen v. City of Eveleth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 1933No. 29,408PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OLSEN, Justice.
The appeal is from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial, after trial by the court and decision in favor of the plaintiff. For convenience we refer herein to Carl W. Tamminen as plaintiff and to the city of Eveleth, its mayor, and councilmen as defendants, unless otherwise stated.
There is not much dispute as to the facts. The city of Eveleth operates under a home rule charter and has a commission form of government. The council, consisting of the mayor and four council^ men, governs the city. The mayor and councilmen are elected in November of each odd-numbered…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Lang v. Mayor of BayonneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1907
- Burt v. Winona & St. Peter RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- State ex rel. Bales v. BaileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Matter of QuinnNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Garnier v. Louisiana Milk CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Kimble v. BenderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- State v. O'REILLYSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- The Marckel Co. v. ZitzowSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
- Klatt v. AkersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.