Legal Opinion
Saturn of Kings Automall, Inc. v. Mike Albert Leasing, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided August 15, 2001No. 00-1478PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.
This appeal involves a dispute concerning the ownership of three motor vehicles. The parties have stipulated to the following facts.
On November 19, 1998, Gallatin Auto Sales (“Gallatin”) contracted with Saturn of Kings Automall, Inc. (“Saturn”) whereby Gallatin agreed to purchase five motor vehicles from Saturn. Among the motor vehicles Gallatin agreed to purchase were a 1996 Honda Accord LX and a 1995 Honda Accord EX. The purchase price for the 1996 Honda was $13,500 and the purchase price for the 1995 Honda was $13,100.
Saturn permitted Gallatin to remove all five vehicles from its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelley Kar Co. v. FinklerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
- Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
- Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Hughes v. Al Green, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Pfluger v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Drown v. Perfect (In Re Giaimo)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Madrid v. Bloomington Auto Co., Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- Brasher's Cascade Auto Auction v. Valley Auto Sales & LeasingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Allan Nott Enterprises, Inc. v. Nicholas Starr Auto, L.L.C.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- First Merit Bank, N.A. v. AngeliniOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.