Legal Opinion

Smith v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1988No. 87-1357PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

In this case, we are asked to determine whether the Ohio Certificate of Title Act1 or the Ohio Uniform Commercial Code2 determines the issue of whether an alleged *152seller’s insurance policy applies with respect to risk of loss or damage after the sale of an automobile. Analysis of the pertinent statutes and recent case law leads us to conclude the Ohio Uniform Commercial Code controls.

R.C. 1302.42(B), U.C.C. 2-401, provides:

“Unless otherwise explicitly agreed, title passes to the buyer at the time and place at which the seller completes his performance with reference to the physical delivery…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Al Green, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Waggoner v. WilsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Motors Insurance Corporation v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
  4. American Mutual Fire Insurance v. Cotton States Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Truck Insurance Exchange v. SchuenemannCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Saturn of Kings Automall, Inc. v. Mike Albert Leasing, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Abney v. Western Reserve Mutual Casualty Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Grange Mutual Casualty Co. v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. In Re AmosUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1996
  5. First Merit Bank, N.A. v. AngeliniOhio Court of Appeals · 2004

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API