Legal Opinion

Brasher's Cascade Auto Auction v. Valley Auto Sales & Leasing

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 25, 2004No. F043502PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DAWSON, J.

The Uniform Commercial Code establishes rules that address a variety of situations where losses must be allocated between relatively innocent parties because a third party whose misconduct caused the loss is insolvent or no longer available. That situation is presented here. A middleman who purchased vehicles from an auction company-secured lender and resold the vehicles to a used car dealer failed to apply the proceeds from the resale to pay off the auction company-secured lender. This appeal concerns whether the loss caused by the insolvent middleman should be borne by the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Day v. City of FontanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Garcia v. McCutchenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cristler v. Express Messenger Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Ceja v. Rudolph & Sletten, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Coburn v. SievertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. County of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Smith v. Selma Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API