Legal Opinion

Kelley Kar Co. v. Finkler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1951No. 32281PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMiddleton, J.

Can The Kelley Kar Company, relying solely upon the reservation of title contained in the conditional sale contract executed in California, recover, in an Ohio court, possession of the automobile from Finkler who purchased it in good faith relying upon an Ohio certificate of title, regular on its face, and which named as the owner of the car the one from whom Finkler purchased it, there being no notation on the Ohio certificate of title so held by the seller of any liens, rights or interests held or claimed by The Kelley Kar Company?

The advent of motor vehicles early in the century created…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Mielke v. LeebersonOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Nichols v. Bogda Motors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Automobile Finance Co. v. MundayOhio Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. City Loan & Savings Co. v. TaggartOhio Supreme Court · 1938

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Al Green, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Levin v. NielsenOhio Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co. v. GallOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  4. In Re GunderUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
  5. Walther v. Central Trust Co., N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API