Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward M. Claridge and Kay T. Claridge, His Wife and State of Arizona Ex Rel. Obed M. Lassen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1969No. 22312PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

This action was instituted by the United States to quiet title to lands located on the Arizona side of the Colorado River in the Palo Verde Valley. Judgment of the District Court was rendered in favor of the United States. 279 F.Supp. 87 (D.Ariz.1967). From that judgment the defendants and the State of Arizona, as intervenor, have appealed. They assert that the lands in question are not in the public domain but that title thereto passed to the State of Arizona upon its becoming a state in 1912. They contend that at that time the lands were in the bed of the Colorado River 1 and remained there…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. IngersollSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
  2. Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. State of Alabama v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  4. R. A. Beaver v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  5. United States v. ClaridgeDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1967

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Bonelli Cattle Co. v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Brainard v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Parm v. ShumateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  4. P. F. Z. Properties, Inc. v. TrainDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
  5. State of California, Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. United States of America, Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior, Sierra Club, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API