Legal Opinion

State of California, Ex Rel. State Lands Commission v. United States of America, Donald P. Hodel, Secretary of the Interior, Sierra Club, Intervenors

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1986No. 85-1965PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

The State of California appeals from a judgment awarding the United States title to land exposed by the recession of Mono Lake. California argues that the district court erred in 1) adopting federal rather than state law as the rule of decision to determine the ownership of the exposed lake bed; 2) applying the law of reliction to the recession of Mono Lake; 3) selecting the methodology to be used in determining whether the recession of the Lake has been “gradual and imperceptible” for purposes of the reliction doctrine; and 4) granting intervention to the Sierra Club…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Oregon Ex Rel. State Land Board v. Corvallis Sand & Gravel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Wilson v. Omaha Indian TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Prete v. BradburyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Venegas v. SkaggsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Main HurdmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1987
  4. United States v. MilnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Government of Guam ex rel. Guam Economic Development Authority v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API