United States v. Claridge
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND JUDGMENT
CRAIG, District Judge.
The within action was instituted by the United States for the purpose of quieting title to certain land hereinafter described, to evict the defendant occupants of the land, and for damages claimed to have resulted from the use and occupancy of the land by the defendant occupants. The land in controversy is described as follows:
The South Half of the Southwest Quarter (S%SW%) of Section 22; all of Section 27; The South Half of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (S%SE%NE&) of Section 28; and that part of Lot Three…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
- United States v. Appalachian Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Edward M. Claridge and Kay T. Claridge, His Wife and State of Arizona Ex Rel. Obed M. LassenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- A. G. Attebury Et Ux. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- State v. Bonelli Cattle CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. PankratzAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. BONELLI CATTLE COMPANYArizona Supreme Court · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.