Legal Opinion

Brainard v. State

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 2000No. 98-0578PublishedCited by 109 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hankinson

Today we resolve a boundary dispute between the State of Texas and thirty owners of lands bounded by the Canadian River as it flows through Roberts and Hutchinson Counties in the Panhandle. The parties disagree about whether conditions on the Canadian River that were brought about or influenced by the closing of the Sanford Dam in 1965 should be considered by surveyors in marking the present-day gradient boundary of the Canadian River. The State contends that the location of the gradient boundary between the State’s riverbed and the private riparian land must be determined by the last…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. County of St. Clair v. LovingstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. St. Louis v. RutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State of Texas v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1932

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by109 opinions

  1. Perry Homes v. CullTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Martin v. AmermanTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Compaq Computer Corp. v. LaprayTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Severance v. PattersonTexas Supreme Court · 2012

104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API