Legal Opinion

State v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 19, 1993No. T91-2991; CA A75011PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction of DUII, ORS 813.010, contending that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. We affirm.

The pertinent facts are that Officer Bowlds saw defendant pull her vehicle over and stop, of her own volition, on the shoulder of a highway at a place that was posted for emergency parking only. He pulled in behind her, activated his flashing yellow lights, and called out to defendant to see if she needed assistance. Defendant, who had gotten out of her car and was walking away from Bowlds to the front of her vehicle, changed direction and walked up to him.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. GerrishOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  4. State v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  5. State v. DuboisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. Blair/VanisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  2. State v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. OnstadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. OnstadCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. SanchezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API