Legal Opinion

State v. Onstad

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 16, 1996No. C95-03-31745; CA A88760Published

1Opinion of the Court

925 P.2d 154 (1996)

144 Or. App. 149

STATE of Oregon, Appellant,

v.

Gerald Ray ONSTAD, Respondent.

C95-03-31745; CA A88760.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted July 22, 1996.

Decided October 16, 1996.

Douglas F. Zier, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Theodore R. Kulongoski, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General.

No appearance for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J. and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

Defendant was indicted for delivery and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992. Before trial, the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. MatthewsOregon Supreme Court · 1994

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API