Legal Opinion

State v. Gerrish

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 25, 1991No. TC CR8702424; CA A46559; SC S36266PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

The specific procedural issue in this criminal case is whether the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion to suppress evidence obtained following an investigatory inquiry of a potential witness to a felony. The broader legal issue is whether the police officer’s actions violated defendant’s constitutional rights.

After being stopped by an Oregon State Police officer investigating a robbery and shooting, defendant was arrested and charged with driving under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. Defendant filed a pretrial motion to suppress, arguing that the evidence of his…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. AshbaughOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BackstrandOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  5. State v. FairOregon Supreme Court · 2013

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API