Legal Opinion
State v. Blair/Vanis
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 22, 2000No. 97-1737 97-1738 CA A102546 (Control) CA A102547PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.
Defendants were charged with the manufacture and possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(l)(a) and (4)(a). Before trial, they successfully moved to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless search of their van, together with statements that they made to the arresting officers. The state appeals, and we reverse and remand.
We review the trial court’s legal conclusions for errors of law. State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 74-75, 854 P2d 421 (1993). Because the trial court did not make specific findings of historical fact, we presume that the court decided the facts consistently with its…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. Juarez-GodinezOregon Supreme Court · 1997
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2003
- State v. DinsmoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- G.M. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
- State v. WarrinerNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. BondCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.