Legal Opinion

State v. Bridewell

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1988No. TC 1233; CA A38352; SC S34603PublishedCited by 116 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*233CARSON, J.

For allegedly cultivating marijuana upon his premises, defendant was accused by criminal information with Manufacture of a Controlled Substance.1 Evidence of the crime was gathered when deputy sheriffs entered defendant’s premises to investigate his possible disappearance. Defendant contends that their entry was unlawful, and he moved the trial court, inter alia, to suppress “the evidence * * * and * * * all information or knowledge gained either directly or indirectly as a result thereof * * * and all statements.” In addressing defendant’s motion at the suppression hearing, the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Michigan v. TylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by116 opinions

  1. State v. StevensOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  5. People v. RayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

111 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API